I would be available for this. I think the two IP licenses that would be most applicable here would be Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 or Creative Commons Attribution 2.5.

I am not sure what restrictions you want to put on derivative works

that is why I suggest ShareAlike as well as Attribution. I personally

favor Attribution of the two only because it's less retrictive and

since .Net is still largely a MSFT thing most shops implementing things

in .Net will probably shy away from any type of viral licensesing even

something as simple as ShareAlike. If you want my opinion on what

license I favor most out of all licenses then I would say the MIT license.

It is about the most liberal of all the open source licenses and

it gives proprietary works which include your work no hassles so wider

adoption is easier, especially by large corporations who are normally

open source gun shy. Those are my suggestions.

By on 2/24/2006 9:08 PM ()

Andy,

Excellent, I accept. With your background on open source and in maths (and that geometry stuff), you bring immediate skills to needs here.

I'll send materials when we get to the target five members.

---O

By on 2/25/2006 7:25 AM ()

I can probably find an hour a month. Does the whole hour have to come at one time? Or can it be two minutes a day? ;)

By on 2/24/2006 7:36 PM ()

Scott,

Excellent. You are in. When we get to five members, I'll send you appropriate materials.

---O

By on 2/25/2006 7:23 AM ()
IntelliFactory Offices Copyright (c) 2011-2012 IntelliFactory. All rights reserved.
Home | Products | Consulting | Trainings | Blogs | Jobs | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Built with WebSharper