Hi Rob,

This type definition syntax is a relic from early attempts to do interoperability for discirminated union types, but is now obsolete and the 1.9 compiler should have been (but wasn't) adjusted to give a warning when it is used.

Thanks

Don

By on 4/19/2007 2:47 PM ()
IntelliFactory Offices Copyright (c) 2011-2012 IntelliFactory. All rights reserved.
Home | Products | Consulting | Trainings | Blogs | Jobs | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Built with WebSharper